Pro Cycling and the Premier League Rumour Mill

Living here in the UK, in late summer (and, to be honest, much of the rest of the year too) if you are any kind of sports fan it takes some serious effort to avoid the steady torrent of tabloid media nonsense that passes for the Premier League football transfer window.

So we get lavish detail about who might be going where, who has been spotted meeting who at a motorway service station, who likes who, who doesn’t like who, who has taken the club as far as he can, who is a legend, and who is a disgrace.

transfer-rumours-newsAnd at the pinnacle of all these questionable speculations and accusations sits the ultimate and unforgivable sin in the eyes of a football fan – worse than casual racism, sexism, or the giving and receiving of used notes in brown envelopes, it seems: who is a ‘Judas’, a traitor to the cause, and deserving of online personal abuse for the simple act of accepting an improved job offer from another employer?

Just to add further fuel to the sensationalist and grammatically questionable fire, these transfer rumours are often spiced up with lurid stories from the players’ personal life – could anyone but a Premier League footballer find themselves getting involved in a ‘racist sex tape’, for example, as two Leicester City players did recently?

I mean, seriously!!

Premier League football, at least as observed through the eyes of a headline hungry mass media, is bonkers!

What’s this got to do with pro-cycling, I hear you ask; surely the most noble and cultured of professional sports (!?), and not likely to lower itself to such muck-raking!?

Well, whether this was all going on last year and it passed me by, I’m not sure, but post Tour de France 2015 I’ve noticed a steady stream of pro-cyclist transfer tittle-tattle all across the cycling media.

Mark Cavendish at the 2015 Tour de France team presentations (Image: Bert de Boer via Wikimedia cc)
Mark Cavendish at the 2015 Tour de France team presentations
(Image: Bert de Boer via Wikimedia cc)

Not quite at the level of the Premier League, of course, but we’ve had: the long running saga of Kwiatkowski to Sky (will he?); the early announcement of Richie Porte’s transfer to BMC (what does this mean for Van Garderen?); Tinkoff-Saxo confirming contract extensions for a number of star names from 2016 (yawn!); Dan Martin leaving Cannondale-Garmin for an as yet undisclosed new home (interesting…); and my favourite – an apparent 35% chance of Mark Cavendish leaving Ettix-Quick Step and signing for Trek Factory Racing.

Now THAT is my kind of rumour; not wild speculation, not 50/50, not ‘will he won’t he’, but a very specific and thoroughly thought through 35% chance.

Personally, I am always going to struggle to get excited about the basic administrative function of a pro-cyclist putting pen to paper on a contract extension (is it still done with pen and paper…that sounds archaic?) and I can live without most of the other rumours, especially while there is still plenty of racing left in 2015.

Thankfully, there’s little chance of the sport going down the ‘Premier League footballer mentioned the name of one club whilst still playing for another (SHOCK! HORROR! TRAITOR! BURN HIM!)’ route.

Let’s face it, the sport of cycling has more than it’s fair share of dark and murky corners as it is, largely related to historical (and only occasionally current, we hope) performance enhancement.

I imagine that all kinds of non-bike-related shenanigans go on behind closed doors, and pro-cyclists probably behave just as badly as any other group of twenty-something males with a bit of freedom and a chunk of disposable cash in their pockets.

But we don’t want to read about it in papers. Do we?

Advertisements

3 comments

  1. Quite right! Though it’s good to have a few ‘characters’ like Peter Sagan in pro-cycling – in the old days the Cannibal and the Badger had enough character for ten others and in ’70s English football there were the likes of Rodney Marsh, Stan Bowles, Frank Worthington etc.All the above had their little eccentricities and bad behaviour but they were fun (as well as being brilliantly talented).
    People line Tinkoff with their talk of making pro-cycling more like Formula One (yawn) frighten me – one thing we don’t need in pro-cycling is turning the cyclists into the robotic bores that are Formula One drivers …

    Like

  2. That’s a great final question. As adults we should not care about the childish ways of stars. Many, I think, like to follow the mess to justify their own juvenile dalliances. Who knows, I’m beat, just rode a century. Maybe it’s me.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s